MG-09 · Case management

Is every case decided fairly, on time, with the person's whole history and vulnerability in view?

Intake assembles the history from every service and screens for vulnerability; on detection the agent stops. The officer pack sets out the options and provisions without pre-deciding. Reviews go to a different officer with the original decision in front of them, and what they overturn teaches the rules. Measures first.

Median resolution

10 days

working days; was 11

Vulnerability screened

n/a

0 of 10 cases at intake, from text and every service's flags; was by chance

Overturned on review

100%

1 of 1; was 4.1% with nothing fed back

Fed back to the rules

100%

1 accepted; was 0%

History assembled

n/a

automatically, with the source; was by hand from four systems

Awaiting a person

0

0 clocks at risk

Case types

Instrument, options, who decides, clocks

CodeTypeKindLegal effectStandardStatutoryCases
CT-01Concession eligibility determination

Concessions Act (fictional) s 12

DETERMINATIONdelegated officer10 wd3
CT-02Internal review of a decision

Administrative review provisions of the originating Act

REVIEWdelegated officer15 wd28 d3
CT-03Tribunal appeal

Tribunal Act (fictional) s 30

APPEALnone5 wd14 d1
CT-04Debt waiver request

Financial Management Act (fictional) s 33

DETERMINATIONdelegated officer15 wd1
CT-05Information or service request

Service charter

SERVICEnone5 wd1
CT-06Compensation claim

Civil Liability Act (fictional) s 42; claims policy

DETERMINATIONdelegated officer20 wd1

Waiting on a person

Nothing held. Run intake on the received cases.

Activity, reported last

Cases

10

8 to intake

Reviews of other services' decisions

4

MG-02, MG-05, MG-03, MG-04

Rules feedback

1

0 open

Evidence chain

Intact

5 events